← All products

Claims / CU-PROD-002 / V1.0

Claim Evidence Pack

A practical infrastructure claims evidence system for organising contractual propositions, contemporary records, chronology and substantiation gaps before a claim dossier is assembled.

Document volume does not establish substantiation quality

A large file can leave the essential proposition unsupported. Ask what each document actually proves, retain contradictory evidence, and trace the missing links from contractual basis through fact, cause, impact and quantification.

Who it is for

  • Contracts engineers and claim engineers
  • Planning engineers and quantity surveyors
  • Project managers, consultants and commercial managers

What is included

XLSX

Claim Evidence Matrix

Source-to-proposition roles, supportive and contradictory evidence, relevance, reliability and follow-up.

XLSX

Claim Document Index

Controlled document identities, parties, dates, original locations, evidence references and submission selection.

XLSX

Claim Chronology

Separate event and document dates, contemporary or reconstructed basis, actions and related records.

XLSX

Evidence Gap Register

Qualitative gap priorities, consequences, remedial actions, owners and closure evidence.

XLSX

Claim Substantiation Map

Claim element to executed basis, fact, cause, time/cost impact, analysis and submission section.

PDF

Product User Guide

Six practical pages on the evidence chain, dossier preparation and five fictional infrastructure cases.

Recommended workflow

  1. Define a bounded event, claim head and contractual proposition.
  2. Index original records and controlled revisions with stable document IDs.
  3. Explain each source role; retain supportive, contradictory and neutral evidence.
  4. Build the chronology and trace causation, programme and cost consequences.
  5. Assign missing-link actions and connect evidence and analysis to dossier sections.

Preview the files

Actual Lite workbook extract with fictional access and variation propositions, supportive and contradictory records, gaps and actions.
Actual eight-field Lite worksheet with fictional examples. Downloaded working rows are blank.
Actual full Matrix extract showing two fictional sources with separate Supports and Contradicts roles and document dates.
Full Matrix review extract: one source-to-proposition role per row. Fictional records only.

Use it with the review framework

A Claim Is Only as Strong as Its Evidence: How to Build the Substantiation Chain →

Claim Evidence Gap Check →