CivilUncutCONTRACTS. CLAIMS. CONTROL.
← All tools

CU-TOOL-005 / Practitioner assessment / Local review

Claim Evidence Gap Check

Identify the weak proposition in one claim-head evidence chain and assign the next Matrix or Document Index action.

Document volume does not measure substantiation quality. This check does not authenticate records, decide admissibility, notice compliance, contractual entitlement, claim success or monetary recovery. Complete a maintained proposition Matrix and source Index before professional review.

Section 1 of 16 · Answers stay in this tab

Define the review

Use local reference IDs and concise evidence descriptions. Do not paste confidential clauses, project names or personal payroll details. Nothing is uploaded or saved remotely. Closing or reloading this tab clears answers.

Changing context or foundational evidence marks dependent entries Unknown for re-review and preserves their text.

Continue the review

Read the related CivilUncut guide →

Update your Evidence Matrix and Document Index

Use each finding to update the proposition row in your Matrix, then connect its exact source ID and page/entry to your Document Index. Assign the action, owner and reviewed date shown below. The free Lite worksheet is available below. The full Matrix and Document Index are part of the Claim Evidence Pack, available soon.

Get the free Claim Evidence Matrix Lite →

Review the Claim Evidence Pack contents →

Required Matrix and Index structures

Matrix: event ID, claim head, proposition ID/text, clause/schedule, source ID/page/entry, what supported, limitation, adverse source, inference/assumption, calculation, review state, next action, owner, due/review date, reviewer and revision.

Index: stable source ID, title/type, author, event/observation date, issue date, revision, original/reconstructed status, controlled file location, page range, linked proposition IDs, authenticity/dispute status and supersession.

Keep originals and version history. A Matrix is not an admissibility certificate. Review one head at a time and preserve contrary evidence.